Skip to main content

Track

Materiality Scrapes and Sandbagging (2023)

This program teaches lawyers about various aspects of two advanced M&A concepts found in acquisition agreements – materiality scrapes and sandbagging. It covers drafting and negotiating tips, buyer and seller perspectives, and market trend information from the ABA M&A Committee’s 2022-23 Private Target Deal Points Study.

CLE Available

CLE credit details

  1. Alabama

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  2. Alaska

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    0.0
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  3. Arizona

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  4. Arkansas

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  5. California

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  6. Colorado

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  7. Connecticut

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  8. Delaware

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  9. District of Columbia

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Non-MCLE
  10. Florida

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.5
    Status:
    Applied For
  11. Georgia

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  12. Hawaii

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  13. Idaho

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  14. Illinois

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  15. Indiana

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.1
    Status:
    Approved
  16. Iowa

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  17. Kansas

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Applied For
  18. Louisiana

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.08
    Status:
    Approved
  19. Maine

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  20. Maryland

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Non-MCLE
  21. Massachusetts

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Non-MCLE
  22. Michigan

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.3
    Status:
    Non-MCLE
  23. Minnesota

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  24. Mississippi

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.1
    Status:
    Approved
  25. Missouri

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.3
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  26. Nebraska

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  27. New Hampshire

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.08
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  28. New Jersey

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.3
    Status:
    Reciprocity
  29. New Mexico

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  30. New York

    Category:
    Areas of Professional Practice
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  31. North Carolina

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  32. North Dakota

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Available for Credit
  33. Ohio

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  34. Oklahoma

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.5
    Status:
    Approved
  35. Oregon

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  36. Pennsylvania

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  37. Rhode Island

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  38. South Carolina

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Applied For
  39. South Dakota

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Non-MCLE
  40. Tennessee

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.08
    Status:
    Approved
  41. Texas

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  42. Utah

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  43. Vermont

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  44. Washington

    Category:
    Law & Legal Procedure
    Credit hours:
    1.0
    Status:
    Approved
  45. West Virginia

    Category:
    General
    Credit hours:
    1.3
    Status:
    Applied For
Start Track
  1. still frame from Materiality Scrapes 10 min

    Materiality Scrapes

    An introduction to damages scrapes, breach scrapes, and double materiality scrapes. Features interviews with ABA M&A Committee members Rita-Anne O’Neill from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Craig Menden from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.

  2. still frame from Materiality Scrapes: Buyer & Seller Perspectives 13 min

    Materiality Scrapes: Buyer & Seller Perspectives

    A discussion of the perspectives and negotiating positions of buyers and sellers regarding materiality scrapes in acquisition agreements. Features ABA M&A Committee members Rita-Anne O’Neill from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Craig Menden from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.

  3. still frame from Materiality Scrapes: Drafting 3 min

    Materiality Scrapes: Drafting

    A look at typical materiality scrape provisions, featuring drafting tips and perspectives from ABA M&A Committee members Rita-Anne O’Neill from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Craig Menden from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.

  4. still frame from Materiality Scrapes: Market Trends 6 min

    Materiality Scrapes: Market Trends

    ABA M&A Committee members Rita-Anne O’Neill from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Craig Menden from Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP discuss market trends for materiality scrapes, drawing on data from the ABA M&A Committee's Private Target M&A Deal Points Study.

  5. still frame from Sandbagging 10 min

    Sandbagging

    An explanation of sandbagging in private M&A deals, including a discussion on pro and anti-sandbagging provisions and how different courts and jurisdictions handle the issue. Features interviews with ABA M&A Committee members Nate Cartmell from Pillsbury LLP and Lisa Hedrick from Hirschler Fleischer PC.

  6. still frame from Sandbagging: Sample Provisions 9 min

    Sandbagging: Sample Provisions

    A look at typical sandbagging provisions, including pro-sandbagging and anti-sandbagging provisions. Also includes drafting tips and perspectives from ABA M&A Committee members Nate Cartmell from Pillsbury LLP and Lisa Hedrick from Hirschler Fleischer PC.

  7. still frame from Sandbagging: Buyer and Seller Perspectives 7 min

    Sandbagging: Buyer and Seller Perspectives

    A discussion on buyer and seller perspectives regarding the issue of sandbagging. Features ABA M&A Committee members Nate Cartmell from Pillsbury LLP and Lisa Hedrick from Hirschler Fleischer PC.

  8. still frame from Sandbagging: Market Trends 7 min

    Sandbagging: Market Trends

    ABA M&A Committee members Lisa Hedrick from Hirschler Fleischer PC and Nate Cartmell from Pillsbury LLP discuss market trends for sandbagging provisions, drawing on data from the ABA’s Private Target M&A Deal Points Study. Lisa and Nate talk about why so many deals are silent on sandbagging, the risk of being silent, and where they think the trend is heading.